One of the earliest adopters of DPubS, the Pennsylvania State University Libraries’ implementation provides an insightful case study. Initially, the library faced the challenge of migrating their extensive collection of print resources into a digital format. They saw the potential of DPubS as a solution to create a comprehensive and accessible digital repository.
Their strategy involved meticulous digitization of their print resources and efficient metadata creation to ensure easy discovery. The library used DPubS’s flexible, modular architecture to customize the system to fit their specific needs.
The outcome was a successful digital transformation that expanded the reach of the library’s resources. It also enhanced the library’s reputation as a leader in digital publishing, and encouraged other libraries in the Penn State system to adopt DPubS.
Cornell University’s arXiv, a repository of electronic preprints in the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, and more, faced a significant challenge in managing the rapid growth in submissions and users. They adopted DPubS to provide a robust, scalable solution for their digital publishing needs.
Their strategy included integrating DPubS with their existing systems and processes, and harnessing its capabilities for managing large volumes of content. They used DPubS’s features for handling multiple file and metadata formats, allowing for seamless ingestion and dissemination of a wide variety of research outputs.
The result was a dramatic improvement in arXiv’s capacity to manage submissions, and enhanced accessibility and discoverability of its content. The success of DPubS’s implementation at arXiv has made it a model for other similar repositories worldwide.
Project MUSE, a leading provider of digital humanities and social sciences content, faced the challenge of transitioning from a traditional publishing model to an open access one. They chose DPubS for its flexibility in supporting multiple business models and its strong focus on open access.
Their strategy involved redefining their publishing workflows to accommodate the open access model, leveraging DPubS’s online editorial management services. They also made extensive use of DPubS’s administrative management tools, which were critical for the smooth running of their operations.
The outcome was a successful transition to open access, resulting in increased visibility and usage of Project MUSE’s content. The implementation of DPubS also improved their operational efficiency and provided valuable experience in managing open access publications.
These case studies highlight the versatility and power of DPubS in addressing a wide range of digital publishing challenges. From digitizing print collections and managing rapid growth, to facilitating a transition to open access, DPubS has proven to be a reliable and effective solution. These real-world examples provide invaluable insights into the practicalities of implementing DPubS, and underscore its significant impact on the global scholarly communication landscape.